You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, welcome to Last Chaos Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:19
+1000000as of rule 13 it says u may not attack and benefit defenders and defenders may not do attackers that way right ?? soo
how the (how to put this) hell ?? is it okay for attackers to pk attackers on mcs at throne room i get it its ok of field but at throne room that is
benefitting defenders and is violating rules i kno ppl reported ppl for what outlawz took mcs on alt guild witch is okay as it is 2 dif guilds but ppl
are hurt up their (beep) about it.. so comeon why is it this is an issue? they did not violate rule they defended with main and had to relog alts to attack
as no1 where on both toons.
i play for 2 reasons pvp and sieges..
if i cant go sieges i pvp and ppl are butthurt about it becouse they belive im a sorelooser.. well ty. im not
the only pve i done in the game has been to build my toon make it good for pvp. and isent that what its all about ??
or is every1 just buying iriscash to make 1 after another pve toon that does nothing but that ? seems like a waste off time
as Theres plenty of other games for pve..
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:22
Or they could just fix the first stage, where attackers can kill attackers 
Fun siege though, wish I could say the same for dcs but its 1am on monday 
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:23
gamgo plsOr they could just fix the first stage, where attackers can kill attackers
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:24
last time I actively did sieges, pk was not allowed.. It might have changed now I guess... BUT...
The game mechanic allows players participating in a siege to automatically target and attack others, so why put pk on?
is this not (quote from game rules) "Killing players participating in a tournament"? which already allows automatic target and attack without having to use pk too..
But yeah.. was a fun siege.. minus the pk.. i mean if you wanted to kill players, you could reg defense, then you can kill all attackers
Go to the top of the page
Date of registration: 6. July 2016
Location: Denmark
Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:33
last time I actively did sieges, pk was not allowed.. It might have changed now I guess... BUT...
The game mechanic allows players participating in a siege to automatically target and attack others, so why put pk on?
is this not (quote from game rules) "Killing players participating in a tournament"? which already allows automatic target and attack without having to use pk too..
But yeah.. was a fun siege.. minus the pk.. i mean if you wanted to kill players, you could reg defense, then you can kill all attackers
Go to the top of the page
Date of registration: 3. September 2014
Location: USA
Occupation: Last Chaos Community Manager
Thanks: 325
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:44
So you're saying MCS was actually glitched for ~ 8 years? LolWe have been told that stage 1 is not broken so therefore will not be "fixed".
Go to the top of the pageDate of registration: 6. July 2016
Location: Denmark
Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:45
We have been told that stage 1 is not broken so therefore will not be "fixed". As for the PKing, that is also allowed at sieges, and has been for quite some time.
Rule 13 is in regards to parties between attackers and defenders during siege, that would be the support discussed therein. This was for the attackers and defenders partying one another to heal, buffs or debuff defenders and nothing more.
Go to the top of the pageDate of registration: 6. July 2016
Location: Denmark
Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:46
So you're saying MCS was actually glitched for ~ 8 years? Lol
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vilya" (21. August 2016, 00:47) with the following reason: Rule Enforcement: Rule 3. Clarity of threads and posts 3.4 You are just allowed to quote the statement you are directly referring to.
Go to the top of the pageDate of registration: 6. July 2016
Location: Denmark
Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:04
would maybe be a good idea to just make a list of whats allowed at sieges instead of whats not couse ppl doesnt seem to understand it allso how do the sieges work?
is it ok to reg def kill def ?? or reg attack to kill attack ?? on mcs that is and on dcs ok to reg def and kill def ? ?
this surely seems like complete violation of the game mechanics no other game is being run this much down in the dirt.
i mean where in the world have the ppl gotten the idea to defend u kill other def ??
sieges supose to be a guild effort not multiply guilds to join forces to be able to do them
sorry but isent it wrong to have to use pvp flag to play sieges.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "The1AndOnly" (20. August 2016, 18:13)
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:15
how can they be allowed to suport defenders ??[/quote]
how can attackers pk attackers at throne i mean the attackers doing this failed field..
how can they be allowed to suport defenders ??
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:25
( old thread ) Go to the top of the pageDate of registration: 6. July 2016
Location: Denmark
Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:30
"#13 Event / Game Feature Interference
You may not use or abuse any game features to create a scenario that is logically not intended during an event, even if technically possible and permitted by game design.
(Examples: Killing someone intentionally who needs to be protected. Killing players participating in a tournament. Supporting attackers while being a Defender in castle siege.)Sanctions
According to the severity of the violation, the following sanctions are possible:WarningTemporary account banPermanent account banIP block"
------------------------------------------
To me the fact that guilds loosing out in stage1 as attackers, go with PK in stage2 attacking other attackers, is clearly violating the game mechanics. We are in a "tournament" and we need to be protected from additional attacks, from people not meant to be there as intended.
Think about it. the twisting and turning of rules shows that the1 is absolutely right abot the need of enforced rules. Even bubsy asked for it ( old thread )
Rawr/ Pruss
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:32
Lol , under the post to the right click "quote" then i use the first choice "directly" and there you go
Quoted from "The1AndOnly"
thanks pruss for that i still dont kno how u quote from other post =( teachhhh mmeeee!
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vilya" (21. August 2016, 00:46) with the following reason: Rule Enforcement: Rule 3. Clarity of threads and posts 3.4 You are just allowed to quote the statement you are directly referring to.
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 19:32
"#13 Event / Game Feature Interference
You may not use or abuse any game features to create a scenario that is logically not intended during an event, even if technically possible and permitted by game design.
(Examples: Killing someone intentionally who needs to be protected. Killing players participating in a tournament. Supporting attackers while being a Defender in castle siege.)
Sanctions
According to the severity of the violation, the following sanctions are possible:
- Warning
- Temporary account ban
- Permanent account ban
- IP block"
------------------------------------------
To me the fact that guilds loosing out in stage1 as attackers, go with PK in stage2 attacking other attackers, is clearly violating the game mechanics. We are in a "tournament" and we need to be protected from additional attacks, from people not meant to be there as intended.
Think about it. the twisting and turning of rules shows that the1 is absolutely right abot the need of enforced rules. Even bubsy asked for it
Rawr/ Pruss
Go to the top of the page
Saturday, 20. August 2016, 19:50
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Surestrike" (20. August 2016, 20:21)
Go to the top of the page
The Dungeon »
Let's talk about rules ( no link attached )
(25. January 2016, 08:11)
Sunday, 15. December 2019, 05:01 Go to the top of the page
