You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to Last Chaos Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

1

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:13

enforce rules ty

as of rule 13 it says u may not attack and benefit defenders and defenders may not do attackers that way right ?? soo
how the (how to put this) hell ?? is it okay for attackers to pk attackers on mcs at throne room i get it its ok of field but at throne room that is
benefitting defenders and is violating rules i kno ppl reported ppl for what outlawz took mcs on alt guild witch is okay as it is 2 dif guilds but ppl
are hurt up their (beep) about it.. so comeon why is it this is an issue? they did not violate rule they defended with main and had to relog alts to attack
as no1 where on both toons.

i play for 2 reasons pvp and sieges..
if i cant go sieges i pvp and ppl are butthurt about it becouse they belive im a sorelooser.. well ty. im not

the only pve i done in the game has been to build my toon make it good for pvp. and isent that what its all about ??
or is every1 just buying iriscash to make 1 after another pve toon that does nothing but that ? seems like a waste off time
as Theres plenty of other games for pve..

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

pruss

Rising Star

Posts: 93

Date of registration: 19. July 2015

  • Send private message

2

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:19

as of rule 13 it says u may not attack and benefit defenders and defenders may not do attackers that way right ?? soo
how the (how to put this) hell ?? is it okay for attackers to pk attackers on mcs at throne room i get it its ok of field but at throne room that is
benefitting defenders and is violating rules i kno ppl reported ppl for what outlawz took mcs on alt guild witch is okay as it is 2 dif guilds but ppl
are hurt up their (beep) about it.. so comeon why is it this is an issue? they did not violate rule they defended with main and had to relog alts to attack
as no1 where on both toons.

i play for 2 reasons pvp and sieges..
if i cant go sieges i pvp and ppl are butthurt about it becouse they belive im a sorelooser.. well ty. im not

the only pve i done in the game has been to build my toon make it good for pvp. and isent that what its all about ??
or is every1 just buying iriscash to make 1 after another pve toon that does nothing but that ? seems like a waste off time
as Theres plenty of other games for pve..
+1000000

Oh. In before lock or erase :D
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

MaZZaCre

Rising Star

  • "MaZZaCre" is female

Posts: 123

Date of registration: 13. December 2013

Location: GER

Thanks: 12

  • Send private message

3

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:22

Or they could just fix the first stage, where attackers can kill attackers :)
Fun siege though, wish I could say the same for dcs but its 1am on monday ?(


A Fairy Tale FULL HD | \_/ carecup, its empty ~
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

Posts: 23

  • Send private message

4

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:23

Or they could just fix the first stage, where attackers can kill attackers :)
gamgo pls
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

LadyS

Newbie

  • "LadyS" is female

Posts: 28

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

  • Send private message

5

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:24

last time I actively did sieges, pk was not allowed.. It might have changed now I guess... BUT...

The game mechanic allows players participating in a siege to automatically target and attack others, so why put pk on?
is this not (quote from game rules) "Killing players participating in a tournament"? which already allows automatic target and attack without having to use pk too..

But yeah.. was a fun siege.. minus the pk.. i mean if you wanted to kill players, you could reg defense, then you can kill all attackers ?(

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

6

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:33

last time I actively did sieges, pk was not allowed.. It might have changed now I guess... BUT...
The game mechanic allows players participating in a siege to automatically target and attack others, so why put pk on?
is this not (quote from game rules) "Killing players participating in a tournament"? which already allows automatic target and attack without having to use pk too..
But yeah.. was a fun siege.. minus the pk.. i mean if you wanted to kill players, you could reg defense, then you can kill all attackers


yea lady problem is the attackers wanted to win but could not but id back you up on that fail field battle butt off mcs throne battle go defense if u want to stay the entire time. =)
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

Vilya

Community Manager (en/es/it/pl/ru)

  • "Vilya" is female

Posts: 8,576

Date of registration: 3. September 2014

Location: USA

Occupation: Last Chaos Community Manager

Thanks: 325

  • Send private message

7

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:38

We have been told that stage 1 is not broken so therefore will not be "fixed". As for the PKing, that is also allowed at sieges, and has been for quite some time.

Rule 13 is in regards to parties between attackers and defenders during siege, that would be the support discussed therein. This was for the attackers and defenders partying one another to heal, buffs or debuff defenders and nothing more.


Community Manager EN/ES/IT/PL/RU
Homepage | Support|
Facebook | Discord Chat
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

MaZZaCre

Rising Star

  • "MaZZaCre" is female

Posts: 123

Date of registration: 13. December 2013

Location: GER

Thanks: 12

  • Send private message

8

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:44

We have been told that stage 1 is not broken so therefore will not be "fixed".
So you're saying MCS was actually glitched for ~ 8 years? Lol

A Fairy Tale FULL HD | \_/ carecup, its empty ~
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

9

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:45

We have been told that stage 1 is not broken so therefore will not be "fixed". As for the PKing, that is also allowed at sieges, and has been for quite some time.
Rule 13 is in regards to parties between attackers and defenders during siege, that would be the support discussed therein. This was for the attackers and defenders partying one another to heal, buffs or debuff defenders and nothing more.


okay so rule13 again here we go...
your not allowed attack and aid defenders or defend and aid attack right ??
ohh okay i allready think what u will post to this soo ill go right ahead..
how can attackers pk attackers at throne i mean the attackers doing this failed field..
how can they be allowed to suport defenders ??
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

10

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 17:46



So you're saying MCS was actually glitched for ~ 8 years? Lol



its been around 5 years but yea

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vilya" (21. August 2016, 00:47) with the following reason: Rule Enforcement: Rule 3. Clarity of threads and posts 3.4 You are just allowed to quote the statement you are directly referring to.

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

11

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:04

would maybe be a good idea to just make a list of whats allowed at sieges instead of whats not couse ppl doesnt seem to understand it allso how do the sieges work?
is it ok to reg def kill def ?? or reg attack to kill attack ?? on mcs that is and on dcs ok to reg def and kill def ? ?
this surely seems like complete violation of the game mechanics no other game is being run this much down in the dirt.
i mean where in the world have the ppl gotten the idea to defend u kill other def ??
sieges supose to be a guild effort not multiply guilds to join forces to be able to do them

sorry but isent it wrong to have to use pvp flag to play sieges. ?(

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "The1AndOnly" (20. August 2016, 18:13)

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

LadyS

Newbie

  • "LadyS" is female

Posts: 28

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

  • Send private message

12

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:15

how can they be allowed to suport defenders ??[/quote]

how can attackers pk attackers at throne i mean the attackers doing this failed field..
how can they be allowed to suport defenders ??



yeah, that's the question phrased perfectly.. The attackers pk'ing in throne room did not make the field battle, so how come they are in the throne room to begin with.. They are not allowed there?
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

pruss

Rising Star

Posts: 93

Date of registration: 19. July 2015

  • Send private message

13

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:25

"#13 Event / Game Feature Interference
You may not use or abuse any game features to create a scenario that is logically not intended during an event, even if technically possible and permitted by game design.

(Examples: Killing someone intentionally who needs to be protected. Killing players participating in a tournament. Supporting attackers while being a Defender in castle siege.)

Sanctions
According to the severity of the violation, the following sanctions are possible:
  • Warning
  • Temporary account ban
  • Permanent account ban
  • IP block"

------------------------------------------
To me the fact that guilds loosing out in stage1 as attackers, go with PK in stage2 attacking other attackers, is clearly violating the game mechanics. We are in a "tournament" and we need to be protected from additional attacks, from people not meant to be there as intended.


Think about it. the twisting and turning of rules shows that the1 is absolutely right abot the need of enforced rules. Even bubsy asked for it ^^ ( old thread )


Rawr/ Pruss
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

The1AndOnly

Rising Star

  • "The1AndOnly" is male
  • "The1AndOnly" started this thread

Posts: 177

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

Location: Denmark

Occupation: industri cnc setup's and programming mastercam cadcam cimco

  • Send private message

14

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:30

"#13 Event / Game Feature Interference
You may not use or abuse any game features to create a scenario that is logically not intended during an event, even if technically possible and permitted by game design.
(Examples: Killing someone intentionally who needs to be protected. Killing players participating in a tournament. Supporting attackers while being a Defender in castle siege.)Sanctions
According to the severity of the violation, the following sanctions are possible:WarningTemporary account banPermanent account banIP block"
------------------------------------------
To me the fact that guilds loosing out in stage1 as attackers, go with PK in stage2 attacking other attackers, is clearly violating the game mechanics. We are in a "tournament" and we need to be protected from additional attacks, from people not meant to be there as intended.
Think about it. the twisting and turning of rules shows that the1 is absolutely right abot the need of enforced rules. Even bubsy asked for it ( old thread )
Rawr/ Pruss


thanks pruss for that i still dont kno how u quote from other post =( teachhhh mmeeee! :thumbsup:
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

LadyS

Newbie

  • "LadyS" is female

Posts: 28

Date of registration: 6. July 2016

  • Send private message

15

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:31

copy and paste lol :P

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

pruss

Rising Star

Posts: 93

Date of registration: 19. July 2015

  • Send private message

16

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 18:32

Quoted from "The1AndOnly"



thanks pruss for that i still dont kno how u quote from other post =( teachhhh mmeeee! :thumbsup:
Lol , under the post to the right click "quote" then i use the first choice "directly" and there you go :love:

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vilya" (21. August 2016, 00:46) with the following reason: Rule Enforcement: Rule 3. Clarity of threads and posts 3.4 You are just allowed to quote the statement you are directly referring to.

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

Posts: 52

Date of registration: 17. July 2015

  • Send private message

17

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 19:32

"#13 Event / Game Feature Interference
You may not use or abuse any game features to create a scenario that is logically not intended during an event, even if technically possible and permitted by game design.

(Examples: Killing someone intentionally who needs to be protected. Killing players participating in a tournament. Supporting attackers while being a Defender in castle siege.)

Sanctions
According to the severity of the violation, the following sanctions are possible:
  • Warning
  • Temporary account ban
  • Permanent account ban
  • IP block"

------------------------------------------
To me the fact that guilds loosing out in stage1 as attackers, go with PK in stage2 attacking other attackers, is clearly violating the game mechanics. We are in a "tournament" and we need to be protected from additional attacks, from people not meant to be there as intended.


Think about it. the twisting and turning of rules shows that the1 is absolutely right abot the need of enforced rules. Even bubsy asked for it ^^ ( old thread )


Rawr/ Pruss

If you're going to refer to me in the case for the enforcement of actual old-style Siege Rules, please be advised that as part of those rules, the use of "alt" Guilds to capture the same/other Siege would also be disallowed. Just food for thought.
  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

Surestrike

Sincere Adventurer

  • "Surestrike" is male

Posts: 417

Date of registration: 10. July 2015

Location: Texas

Occupation: Safety specialist

  • Send private message

18

Saturday, 20. August 2016, 19:50

OK...I did not want to open up this can of worms but, since everyone is getting all bent out of shape...would it not be a violation of rule 13 if defenders allowed a certain group of attackers to kill them to gain points to advance to the throne? It seems to me that this is a clear violation of rule 13. It is in fact a more egregious violation that buffing but, I really don't know the circumstance behind that buffing so...

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Surestrike" (20. August 2016, 20:21)

  • Go to the top of the page
  • Activate Facebook

This post by "bellydancer" (Saturday, 20. August 2016, 20:47) has been deleted by user "Vilya" (Sunday, 21. August 2016, 00:39) with the following reason: Off Topic

This post by "Bran" (Saturday, 20. August 2016, 21:11) has been deleted by user "Vilya" (Sunday, 21. August 2016, 00:39) with the following reason: Off Topic

Similar threads